“I asked ChatGPT to score TSTT’s handling of the cyber attack, break down what they did wrong, and how to improve it."
- Writer for DDI on Medium
- Jul 19
- 3 min read
Updated: Aug 11

What’s the likelihood of someone having little to no brain engagement after months of using ChatGPT to analyse situations and come up with solutions for clients?!
According to Dr. Elizabeth Braungart Fauth and Dr. Maria C Norton’s article on A Healthy Brain: Use It or Lose It! If a brain cell is not used, or does not communicate with the cell next door, that brain cell loses its function.
The scientific term for “low brain engagement” is functional atrophy.
An example of this would feel like, “My brain is super fried. It just doesn’t work like it used to. So I just autopilot through life.”
ChatGPT users in an MIT study experienced this, resorting to copying and pasting with less than a year of prolonged use. But followers of the “just throw it in ChatGPT” movement are literally throwing a party over forgetting how to write a letter, make decisions, or give advice after twenty months of prolonged use.
According to Anne, a nurse for 24 years at San Fernando General Hospital. This is spoken about amongst us medical professionals, Ciji. How AI is making us obsolete and the impact ChatGPT has on our brains. The brain will atrophy if you choose not to use it. And there’s no cure for loss of cells. This is why I write everything. I have a computer now because when you do that, you end up with a lot of paper. But I write for memory purposes. And as a mother, I make sure my children read books or just go outside and play, because the threat is real.
The scientific term for “loss of cells” is brain atrophy.
Genuine question. Anyone in Trinidad and Tobago feel like you've lost brain cells in the last 3 years, just throwing everything in ChatGPT?
THE REWIRING OF THE MINDS OF THE ENTIRE WORLD!
The Bible tells us that we’re transformed by the renewing of our minds. We’re no longer who we once were because of a spiritual rewiring in the control tower.
People who play with words to manipulate or push a self-serving narrative understand that the world is framed by the song they sing. What is thought, what is felt, and what is acted on are controlled by that governing system — a perversion of the true purpose of messaging.
When the word communication is swapped for “engagement” and decline is changed to “scale down”, it makes the filter of a thinking man or woman wonder what you’re trying to hide. Because the sanitizing doesn’t paint the picture of people’s inability to recall how they used their brains before this…“tool”. It’s exactly like flip-flopping on something you said, but acting as if you weren’t the author of it. The sanitizing doesn’t paint the picture of existing videos of you advising people to do this thing. So what are you trying to hide, right?
Are things that bad that we can’t see through the attempt to confuse our ability to think critically?
Before the 1964 report, people already knew smoking was bad; before Meta got grilled about it, people already knew social media was a cause of depression, and before MIT sanitized their words, people already felt dumber using ChatGPT.